“All personalities should review as owner, from first-person perspective”See the rewrite ↗
Three films.
Every decision.
A second screen, an AI reviewer,
and a very human creative process.
From the first sketch to the final cut. Follow the assets, the iterations, the feedback, and what it cost to get there.
Explore the process01 / the outcome
Start with the films.
Three angles on one product. These are the exact accepted exports, with the source versions preserved.
Jun is an AI-generated virtual reviewer. Publication receipts are historical: J1 and J2 had native share links; J3 was submitted and visible on the owner profile, with platform review still pending at the last native check on November 12.
02 / the process
The path was iterative.
Nine rounds of scripts and stills. Seven production checkpoints. Expand any round to see the actual work and the notes behind it.
Loading the preserved production record…
“okay, good enough, will use all three for posting on jun’s account”
J1 v7 · J2 v5 · J3 v4. Accepted exports preserved without further changes.
03 / the ingredients
A reference for everything.
The real product sets the geometry. Jun’s portrait sets the identity. The generated room, boards and frames carry the stories.
The production stack
Built-in image generation for stills and pencil boards; Kling for motion; OmniHuman for speech-driven performances; Gemini TTS with the Achird voice; Whisper for timing; FFmpeg and tracked composites for assembly. Ad Studio held the reviews. Historical model IDs appear in the request ledger below.
The visual archive
Open an image for its full view, prompt when recorded, reference roles and original source hash. Web images are optimized viewing copies; hashes identify the preserved source artwork. Reused images remain visible in the rounds that used them.
The motion archive
Source takes from the preserved provider requests, including candidates later trimmed, replaced or discarded. Open a take to inspect its recorded prompt. These are intermediate assets, separate from the finished films.
04 / the human input
The notes that shaped it.
Story notes, marked regions, full-film reviews and chat instructions. Original wording stays intact, including repeated notes and changes of direction.
“why not skip closing and folding scenes all together”See the decision ↗
Agent QA annotations are excluded from the human count. Exact duplicate or relayed wording is labeled. A recorded response describes what changed; it does not imply that a human approved every intermediate revision.
05 / the costs
What the records show.
Every preserved provider request, including unused takes and errors. The journals record reservations; they do not establish the final billed amount.
| Model / purpose | Requests | Complete | Error / other | Reserved USD |
|---|
The unpriced work
A request that failed may be refunded or never charged. A reservation may exceed the final usage. These are historical journal values, not a current price quote. The ledger is deduplicated by provider request ID, so copied files do not create extra charges.
Open the complete request ledger
| Request | Round | State | Reserved USD |
|---|
A note on the record
Built from the preserved Jun production archive.
Download the public production record ↓